14 April 2006
Death to Free Speech: Profit Mohamed removed from South Park

Comedy Central joins an ever growing list of TV and Newspapers censoring the image of the Profit Mohamed.

Last week South Park started a two-part episode spoofing the Family Guy sitcom (read previous post) titled First Amendment.  It was making fun of Fox refusing to show the Profit.  Within the first episode, the SouthPark creators dared Comedy Central to allow SP to allow the Profit Mohamed to be shown in Episode Two this week.  I'm sure there was a lot of talk around the conference rooms there.

In Episode two, aired Wednesday at 10 PM EST, they attempted to show the Profit.  But they cut the footage, saying "Comedy Central has refused to show the Profit".  But yet, they still had the "Voice" on there. 

South Park has crossed a number of ethnic and racial lines, but there's always a moral the creators try to convey which seems to get lost by most (of not all) anti-South Park people.

The one for this episode was that if we are forced to use censorship, then the Terrorist have won.  As where does censorship stop?  Free Speech entitles oneself a free voice.  Given Comedy Central is FCC monitored, the FCC has not banned the image of Profit Mohamed.  It was Comedy Central itself that refused to show it.

Eric Cartman: "If you hate a TV show, all you have to do is to get an episode pulled.  Pretty soon the show is compromised and it goes off the air. ...so my plan is to use this whole Mohamed thing as a way to scare the network into pulling tonight's show [of Family Guy].

I'm going to use fear to get them to do what I want."

Bart Simpson's spoofed character: "Isn't that like Terrorism?"

Eric Cartman: "No.  It isn't like Terrorism.  It IS Terrorism."

We all are given the right to Free Speech by the constitution of the United States of America.  Giving-in to Terrorist threatening violence is the same as giving into demands when they kidnap hostages: it lets the terrorist know they can get their way.

Would I censor image from my website if you posted the cartoon in a comment?  No.  But I myself respect other religions and beliefs: which I know showing the image would be greatly disrespectful.  If I wanted to thwart the powers-at-be and go against the “man” to make a crude statement (like I would have in my teens), I would have posted it here.

I have been a big South Park fan since episode one due to their true-to-Earth viewpoints, cunning storylines and willing to say the things we are thinking, on the tube – daring all others.  And I will remain a South Park fan.

People I have met that are against South Park tell me what offended them.  When talking to these people, out of the 10 seasons (yes, 10!), all of these complaints and boycotts of South Park all have one thing in common: The focus on the graphic, grotesque nature of the cartoons and speech. 

If you walk up to me and say, “Eric, I can’t believe you are a South Park fan.”  Then I would state the obvious, “You didn't like the movie Fight Club, Secret Window, and other movies with a deep thought behind the obvious storyline, did you?”  South Park on the surface does look highly offensive, and it is at times.  But there’s always an underlining moral if you look close enough.  Over the last two weeks, it was Censorship and how the Profit Mohamed cartoon issue has taken away our right to Free Speech in America.

So I say no to censorship.  Show the image if you wish.  And I will not judge you any differently. 

Reader's Comments
john said:
Had the FCC pulled the show, you'd have a case, but I don't think the constitution protects free speech in a private enterprise. For instance, I could attempt to post all kinds of rude stuff here on CS and I have no doubt it would be removed. That is not censorship! Just like Comedy Central, CS has a right to decide what gets/stays on the air.

Sometimes, rude is just rude, even in cartoons with an alledged message.
# 15 April 06 9:39 AM
John almost has it right.  It is true there is no constitutional prohibition against Comedy Central deciding what it plays on its channel.  Since Comedy Central only receives its licenses through the FCC licensing review/renewal process, the government has essentially censored the entire airwaves.  

I am prohibited from starting my own TV station and broadcasting direct distribution without the approval of the FCC.  And surely they won't allow me to launch my own satellite and broadcast my own media.  Doing so would give me a private enterprise that I rightly self censor.

The government prohibits free speech on the airwaves with "no law…abriding the freedom of speech".  The airwaves are intangible, unlike the press which are the tangible transmission of ideas, therefore broadcast media is speech.

Since Comedy Central is permitted to broadcast because of tightly regulated oversight by the FCC and there is no freedom for alternatives, according to our principals of government, TV Channels are just extension of the government, and they are never taking a principled stand not broadcasting a show.  

There are cases where they might restrict a show because of their image, etc with advertisers, but I think we can all agree that South Park fans are not the most “sensitive” people and showing the prophet was not going to turn any of them away from the show…
# 20 April 06 9:58 PM

It seems we are loosing our rights to free speech, more and more these days. Some may remember a previous

# 12 October 06 4:04 PM

It seems we are loosing our rights to free speech, more and more these days. Some may remember a previous

# 13 October 06 4:07 PM

Congrats to the creators of South Park for the aware earlier this year. If this doesn't open people's

# 22 October 06 2:30 AM
Stanley Bell said:

I don't think we should respect everyone's beliefs. I think that we will soon be at war with the Muslims themselves, because they follow a hateful ideology and are bent on world domination. I think a comparison to the Nazis is reasonable. Would we tolerate Nazis, even the "moderate" ones, if we were at war with Germany? I don't imagine so. We should not be afraid to openly criticize Islam, not just for its contempt for free speech, but for its anti-semetism, its treatment of women, and its inherent violent nature. We may soon have to choose between a medieval world, and a free one--let's not start by being timid.

# 05 January 07 12:03 PM
Leave a Comment
Comment Policy: HTML is not allowed. Links and line breaks are converted automatically.
(required) 
(optional)
(required) 

 


  
Enter the anti-spam code you see above (required)

 

Comment Notifications
Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here